AWS preparing to start work at Lake Anna Technology Campus; Dominion exploring feasibility of small modular nuclear reactor at North Anna
AWS preparing to start work at Lake Anna Technology Campus; Dominion exploring feasibility of small modular nuclear reactor at North Anna
Engage Louisa is a nonpartisan newsletter that keeps folks informed about Louisa County government. We believe our community is stronger and our government serves us better when we increase transparency, accessibility, and engagement.
Thank you for your support
Thank you so much for the condolences and kind words following the passing of my mother, Brenda Brooks Purcell. The last few weeks have been difficult, and your support means a lot to me. I am so grateful to live in this community.
I look forward to continuing to deliver in-depth coverage of Louisa County government to your inbox and social media feeds each week.
Please help Engage Louisa grow its audience by sharing this free and independent newsletter with friends and neighbors.
Thanks again for your support. -Tammy
This week in county government: public meetings, July 22 through July 27
For the latest information on county meetings including public meetings of boards, commissions, authorities, work groups, and internal county committees, click here. (Note: Louisa County occasionally schedules internal committee/work group meetings after publication time. Check the county’s website for the most updated information).
Wednesday, July 24
Community Policy Management Team, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 1 pm.
Thursday, July 25
Lake Anna Advisory Committee, Public Meeting Room, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 6 pm.
Additional information about Louisa County’s upcoming public meetings is available here.
Interested in taking your talents to one of the county’s numerous boards and commissions? Find out more here including which boards have vacancies and how to apply.
AWS preparing to start work at Lake Anna Technology Campus
A plan to build more than 1.7 million square feet of data centers adjacent to the North Anna Power Station is poised to take a significant step forward.
According to county officials, Amazon Web Services (AWS) is preparing to begin initial site work at the Lake Anna Technology Campus (LATC), a 153-acre site at the corner of Kentucky Springs Road (Route 652) and Haley Drive (Route 700) where the tech giant plans to develop seven standard data centers to support the burgeoning demand for cloud computing and other web-based services.
Contractors for AWS as well as county and state officials attended a pre-construction meeting at the campus on July 17. Louisa County Code Enforcement and Erosion and Sediment Control Administrator Kris Nelson told Engage Louisa after the meeting that Clark Construction, a national firm and the project’s general contractor, expects to break ground in the next two to four weeks.
Nelson said Clark is waiting for a greenlight from AWS before moving forward and the meeting was a “proactive” step to ensure work at the site starts smoothly.
Louisa County issued a land disturbance permit for the campus last week, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has issued an initial stormwater permit, and Nelson has signed off on the site’s erosion and sediment control plan.
With those approvals in hand, Clark is preparing to begin the “rough grading” phase. Rough grading includes the installation of erosion and sediment control and stormwater management features and initial grading for buildings and other infrastructure, according to Nelson.
Nelson said that motorists who travel Kentucky Springs Road will likely see an increase in traffic around the site in the coming weeks as contractors bring in large amounts of gravel and equipment. The gravel will be sourced from Cedar Mountain Stone Corporation in southern Culpeper County, likely increasing truck traffic on Route 522 between Rapidan and Wares Crossroads.
According to a permit issued by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) last week, the campus will include five construction entrances—four off Haley Drive and one off Kentucky Springs Road.
Nelson said the main construction entrance will be located off Haley Drive, and the county’s erosion and sediment control plan includes provisions to ensure that adjacent roadways are kept clean and free of debris.
Clark is a national construction firm with extensive experience building warehouses, medical centers and other large-scale projects. Nelson said the company recently served as general contractor for a 12-acre greenhouse in the Louisa County Industrial Air Park where Better Future Farms will produce hydroponic lettuce for wholesale customers.
While Clark will act as general contractor, other companies will participate throughout the construction process. Nelson said that Shirley Construction, a Northern Virginia-based firm, will handle the rough grading phase. Representatives from Shirley also attended the pre-construction meeting.
While AWS has secured some local and state permits, it has yet to clear all its permitting hurdles. The company has submitted a site plan for the project’s first phase to Louisa County’s Community Development Department. The plan is in a third round of staff review, per the county’s website.
The project’s first phase includes construction of a single one-story data center, an administration building, and ancillary infrastructure. The plan requires staff approval before AWS can apply for a building permit and begin construction, according to Senior Planner Tom Egeland.
AWS is also awaiting a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), which is required because the project will permanently impact jurisdictional wetlands and other waters of the US (WOTUS).
A conceptual plan submitted as part of that application provides the most detailed look at AWS’s plans for the campus.
According to the plan, the company intends to build seven standard data centers on the property covering some 1.7 million square feet and providing a minimum of 420 megawatts (MW) of data center capacity “to serve the expanding demand for cloud-based computing.”
The campus is also expected to include an administration building, two smaller buildings, described in the application as “specialty data centers,” two substations capable of providing 300 MW of power each, stormwater basins, a rainwater harvesting pond and water and sewer infrastructure. One of the substations will be owned by Dominion Energy and the other by Rappahannock Electric Cooperative (REC), which provides electricity to the area.
Based on a public notice issued by the Corps in June, AWS’s application is working its way through the National Historic Preservation Act’s Section 106 process, which is required when a project is expected to impact significant cultural or historic resources.
The LATC includes the ruins of Laurel Hill, a circa 1800 home, and sits next to Laurel Hill Baptist Church, a historic African-American church founded in 1868 with an adjoining cemetery. Both sites are eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places.
As part of the Section 106 process, AWS and consulting parties, including the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, are negotiating a Memorandum of Agreement to minimize or mitigate adverse effects on historic properties, per the notice.
Nelson said that it’s his understanding that AWS is close to securing a USACE permit. He noted that any areas subject to the Army Corps’ jurisdiction will be protected as rough grading begins.
Engage Louisa reached out to USACE for an update on the permitting process. At publication time, no one from the agency had responded.
Economic Development Director Andy Wade, who played a key role in securing AWS’s initial commitment to develop data centers in Louisa County, said in an email last week that the campus’s first data center could be online by late 2025 or early 2026. He also said it could take four to five years for the project to reach full buildout, though he noted that was only a guess.
Nelson said that he isn’t sure how long the entire construction process will take, but he expects its traffic impact to come “in spurts” as contractors move in heavy equipment and materials while transitioning to different phases of the project.
Cuckoo District Supervisor Chris McCotter, who represents the area, also attended the pre-construction meeting. McCotter said in a telephone interview late last week that he has some concerns about how construction might affect Kentucky Springs Road and the surrounding community, but he believes the contractors will listen to neighbors and do what they can to minimize any negative impacts.
“I think that communication is incredibly important. From what I could tell the Clark Construction folks know how to communicate, and I think that they will be communicating and letting the community know what to expect,” McCotter said. “I stressed that we really need to understand what it is [they’re] wanting us to endure.”
Related data center and infrastructure development
The Lake Anna site is one of two data center campuses that AWS plans to develop in Louisa County over the next 15 years. The other—the North Creek Technology Campus (NCTC)—is slated for part of a 1444-acre assemblage south of Jefferson Highway (Route 33) and east of Mt. Airy Road (Route 644) near the Northeast Creek Reservoir.
Both campuses are in the county’s Technology Overlay District (TOD), a special zoning designation adopted by the board of supervisors in April 2023 with a goal of attracting lucrative tech sector development. The TOD allows data centers by-right, which means they don’t require a public approval process, and imposes a range of development standards on the use including buffer, setback and landscaping requirements and noise and height restrictions.
AWS has said it plans to start developing the LATC first. The company hasn’t formally applied for any local permits for the NCTC, according to Nelson, nor has it submitted a site plan to the county or publicly disclosed how many data centers it plans to build on the campus. Wade told Engage Louisa in March that AWS could build at least 17 data centers across both campuses.
AWS has submitted at least one significant and revealing document to the county related to the NCTC: a preliminary buffer and landscaping plan, which was publicly discussed at the Planning Commission’s November 9 meeting. The plan provides a glimpse of the potentially massive scale of the campus.
To support the NCTC’s intense demand for power, the plan includes 10 substations, covering 10 acres each, interspersed throughout the campus, and the extension of a 230 kilovolt (kV) transmission line that adjoins the campus’s northern edge.
Lee Brock, Rappahannock Electric Cooperative’s principal engineering manager for energy projects, told the commission that each substation is expected to have the capacity to provide 300 MW of power, meaning the company could supply as a much as 3 gigawatts (GW) of power to the site. For perspective, the twin Westinghouse reactors at North Anna produce about 1.8 GW of electricity, enough to power 450,000 homes.
AWS intends to develop about 816 acres of the NCTC while leaving 628 acres as open space. Of that, about 380 acres is expected to be donated to the county for potential use as a public park. The parkland winds through the campus with much of it hugging Northeast Creek, which runs through the eastern portion of the site.
The company plans to build a new public road system at its expense, which will provide access to both the data centers and parkland. One road extends south from Route 33 and snakes through the campus, connecting to Mt. Airy Road at the southern end of the site. AWS also plans to build an extension off White Walnut Road (Route 758) at the campus’s southern end, connecting it with the other proposed road just east of its intersection with Mt. Airy.
AWS plans to rely on the publicly owned Northeast Creek Reservoir to provide raw water to both the LATC and NCTC and potable water for the latter campus. Raw water will be used to cool the servers and networking equipment inside the facilities.
In a water service agreement inked with AWS in December, the county agreed to build a 11-mile raw water line from the reservoir to the LATC and related infrastructure to serve the site with a target completion date of January 2027. The county committed to build raw and potable water lines, measuring 2,000 feet each, to the NCTC, plus a 6,000-foot sewer force main down Route 33 to a new pump station at Thomas Jefferson Elementary School. That infrastructure is expected to be complete by July 2026.
The LATC will rely on groundwater to cool the data center included in the project’s first phase, according to Wade, then transition to the public system when the raw water line is complete.
At full build out, the campuses are expected to draw, on average, 630,000 gallons of water per day from the reservoir, Wade has said. Based on a recent capacity study, the reservoir has a safe yield capacity of 3.2 million gallons per day with current users, including the Town of Louisa, drawing about 300,000 gallons daily and 500,000 gallons per day at peak demand.
AWS has agreed to pay for all offsite infrastructure required for the sites, according to county officials and company representatives though some of that cost will be offset by state and local infrastructure grants. County officials have said that any local grant funding provided to the company would be drawn from tax revenue generated by the data centers.
Tax revenue from data centers can be tricky to predict because it’s, in part, based on how often pricey computer equipment is replaced. But Wade has said that one data center could generate just over $2 million in tax revenue annually over a 15-year timeframe. He’s also said that each data center could employ 20 to 25 people.
Dominion exploring feasibility of small modular nuclear reactor at North Anna
Virginia’s first commercial small modular nuclear reactor could be coming to Louisa County.
Dominion Energy CEO Robert Blue announced in mid-July that the company is issuing a request for proposals (RFP) from leading nuclear technology companies to explore the feasibility of developing a small modular reactor (SMR) at its North Anna Power Station on the shores of Lake Anna. The facility is already home to a pair of large reactors, which provide about 1.8 gigawatts (GW) of power to the grid—enough electricity to keep the lights on in 450,000 homes.
The company said that while the RFP isn’t a commitment to build an SMR at North Anna, it’s an important step in determining if the technology can support its effort to meet the state’s soaring demand for clean and reliable power.
"For over 50 years nuclear power has been the most reliable workhorse of Virginia's electric fleet, generating 40% of our power and with zero carbon emissions. As Virginia's need for reliable and clean power grows, SMRs could play a pivotal role in an 'all-of-the-above' approach to our energy future. Along with offshore wind, solar and battery storage, SMRs have the potential to be an important part of Virginia's growing clean energy mix," Blue said in a press release.
As the name suggests, SMRs are smaller, simpler versions of traditional reactors, which harness nuclear fission—the process of splitting atomic nuclei into smaller nuclei—to produce energy. SMRs typically produce up to 300 megawatts (MW) of power, about a third of the generation capacity of one of the twin Westinghouse reactors currently operating at North Anna.
While the technology has only been deployed for commercial generation in Russia and China, SMRs are in various stages of development in other parts of the world. For decades, the US military has used a version of the technology to power nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers.
Proponents of SMRs contend the technology could play a key role in meeting the burgeoning demand for energy anticipated in the decades to come. While their larger cousins are custom built on-site, the components of SMRs could be mass produced in factories and shipped for assembly, making them more cost-effective, supporters say. Their smaller footprint means they’d require less land and could be dispatched where there’s a demand for power. And their reliance on fission to generate energy means they don’t emit climate-warming greenhouse gases.
Dominion includes the development of SMRs in its 2023 Integrated Resource Plan, a roadmap for how the utility intends to meet its customers’ demand for power over the next 25 years. The plan forecasts a sharp increase in demand in the next 15 years, driven mostly by data center development, and suggests it could deploy multiple SMRs to help meet that demand, beginning in 2034.
Blue’s announcement came during a ceremonial bill signing at North Anna on July 10, where Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) inked his signature on Senate Bill 454, bipartisan legislation passed by the General Assembly earlier this year aimed at accelerating the development, testing and deployment of SMRs.
Carried by Fairfax Democrat Dave Marsden, the legislation allows Dominion to recover from ratepayers costs associated with developing an SMR via a rate adjustment clause added to customers’ monthly bill. The fee requires approval by the State Corporation Commission (SCC), which regulates the monopoly utility.
Dominion announced on the same day that it plans to request an adjustment clause in a filing with the SCC expected this fall.
Youngkin, a strong proponent of nuclear power in general and SMRs specifically, touted the legislation as a key step in placing Virginia at the forefront of innovative energy production.
In his 2022 Energy Plan, Youngkin prioritized developing an SMR in the next decade, calling it Virginia’s “moonshot.” He initially said he’d like to see the first SMR deployed in southwest Virginia, but earlier this year acknowledged that other areas are “better suited for the first one,” according to media reports.
"In alignment with our All-American, All-of-the-Above energy plan, small modular nuclear reactors will play a critical role in harnessing this potential and positioning Virginia to be a leading nuclear innovation hub. This legislation will allow us to press forward with the potential sighting of an SMR here at North Anna. Together, our potential to unleash and foster a rich energy economy for Virginians is limitless," Youngkin said in a press release.
Louisa County officials were also on hand at the event, making clear that they welcome the development of an SMR in the county and expansion of nuclear energy production at North Anna.
“While there is no commitment to build an SMR at North Anna as of today, we do know siting SMRs on an existing power station property allows for interconnection to the grid and access to a trained workforce,” Louisa County Board of Supervisors Chair Duane Adams said in a press release. “Hopefully, an SMR will soon call Louisa home.”
For nearly 50 years, North Anna has a played a central role in powering Virginia’s homes and businesses. Its pair of pressurized water reactors, dubbed Units 1 and 2, were first commissioned in 1978 and 1980, respectively. They currently produce 17 percent of the state’s power, according to Dominion’s website, and nearly 45 percent of its carbon-free energy.
While the reactors are licensed to operate through 2038 and 2040, Dominion is applying for a Subsequent License Renewal to operate them for an additional 20 years.
Dominion representative Sarah Marshall said earlier this summer that the company expects the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to issue a license renewal for both reactors later this year.
The company also holds a license from the NRC to build a third traditional reactor at North Anna. Dominion received the license in May 2017, but four months later paused the project amid significant cost overruns at two other facilities pursuing new nuclear infrastructure.
Developing an SMR at the plant would require a separate licensing process including approval from the NRC and SCC.
While Dominion executives and state and local officials hailed Blue’s announcement and Marsden’s legislation as an important step toward meeting the state’s clean energy goals and its growing demand for power, not everyone shares their enthusiasm for SMRs.
Some environmentalists and consumer advocates contend the technology isn’t proven or cost effective, and utilities should remain focused on deploying more wind turbines and solar facilities, which they see as a reliable way to produce clean energy and meet the goals of the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA), landmark legislation aimed at combatting climate change.
Passed by the General Assembly in 2020, the VCEA mandates that Dominion and Appalachian Power, the state’s largest utilities, source all their power from carbon-free sources by mid-century.
In opposing Marsden’s bill, the Charlottesville-based Southern Environmental Law Center, a legal and environmental advocacy organization, criticized the legislation for removing critical consumer protections to give preferential treatment to SMRs, which it described as “a technology that is completely unproven for commercial electricity generation.”
“There are currently no operational SMRs delivering electricity to the United States grid, and the leading proposal in the country was recently cancelled. Southern utilities have a poor track record of wasteful attempts at nuclear power plants. Virginia utilities should stay focused on expanding proven clean energy resources,” the organization stated on its website, referencing the cancellation of a $9.3 billion project in Idaho to develop six SMRs. NuScale, the utility leading the initiative, canceled the project as costs ballooned and it failed to attract enough subscribers to move forward.
In a nod to concerns about the impact on ratepayers, Youngkin amended the legislation to cap the fee that can be tacked on to a typical residential customer’s bill at $1.40 a month, down from $1.75 in Marsden’s introduced version. His amendments also bar Dominion from recovering SMR development costs incurred before July 1 and provide that only 80 percent of development costs can be recovered before an SMR is in operation.
Dominion said in its press release that it anticipates its initial request to the SCC will be far below the $1.40 limit.
Environmentalists have also expressed concerns about the proliferation of high-level nuclear waste from small modular reactors. Like traditional reactors, many SMR designs rely on uranium rods for fuel. When those rods are exhausted, they’re highly radioactive and require careful, long-term storage.
The federal government for decades has been searching for an interim or long-term repository for the waste, but neither facility has been developed, leaving the nation’s 54 commercial nuclear power plants to store their high-level waste on site.
At North Anna, the spent rods are first placed in a spent fuel pool where they cool and water shields their radiation. After about five years, the rods are moved to the facility’s Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI), where they’re stored in concrete casks on three pad sites, situated on about three acres.
The board of supervisors, at its July 1 meeting, agreed to renew a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that allows Dominion to store high-level waste at the plant. Marshall told county officials that the company plans to store spent fuel on site until a federally-approved interim or long-term repository is available and agrees to accept waste from the facility.
Marshall said the recently constructed third pad would provide enough space to store waste at least through the reactors’ current licensing period. If the plant adds additional reactors or its reactors are relicensed, Marshall said Dominion would ask the county for permission to expand the ISFSI assuming an off-site repository isn’t available.
Click here for contact information for the Louisa County Board of Supervisors.
Find agendas and minutes from previous Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission meetings as well as archived recordings here.
Click here for contact information for the Louisa County School Board.
Click here for minutes and agendas for School Board meetings. Click here for archived video.
Click here to access past editions of Engage Louisa.
The jobs Wade is referring to are not related to construction.
It appears that no new jobs are coming from the selection of Shirley Construction for the road builds? Will they hire local or bring in existing employees?