School Board previews plan for CTE center; PJM backs construction of new transmission infrastructure through eastern Louisa; BOS roundup; PC preview

Mar 10, 2025

Engage Louisa is a nonpartisan newsletter that keeps folks informed about Louisa County government. We believe our community is stronger and our government serves us better when we increase transparency, accessibility, and engagement.

This week in county government: public meetings, March 10 through March 15

For the latest information on county meetings including public meetings of boards, commissions, authorities, work groups, and internal county committees, click here. (Note: Louisa County occasionally schedules internal committee/work group meetings after publication time. Check the county’s website for the most updated information).

Monday, March 10

Industrial Development Authority, Public Meeting Room, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 9 am.

Tuesday, March 11

Finance Committee, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 4 pm.

Wednesday, March 12

James River Water Authority, Fluvanna County Office Building, 132 Main Street, Palmyra, 9 am.

Louisa County Water Authority, 23 Loudin Lane, Louisa, 6 pm.

Thursday, March 13

Louisa County Planning Commission, long-range planning work session, Public Meeting Room, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 5 pm. (agenda packet, livestream)

Other meetings/events

Monday, March 10

Mineral Town Council, Mineral Town Hall, 312 Mineral Ave., Mineral, 6:30 pm. (agenda packet)

Wednesday, March 12

Supervisor in the Speakeasy with Cuckoo District Supervisor Chris McCotter, The Lion’s Den 1837, 81 Tavern Road, Mineral, 6 pm.

Supervisor McCotter will hold an informal gathering with constituents at The Lion’s Den pub.

Additional information about Louisa County’s upcoming public meetings is available here.

Quote of the week

“It’s not a big building. It’s less than 60,000 square feet. But it’s a complex building. There’s a lot going on here. It’s going to be a fantastic building.”

-Jack Clark of RRMM Architects on a new Career and Technical Eduction Center slated for construction next door to Louisa County High School.

Read more about Louisa County Public Schools’ plan for the center in the article below.

School Board previews plan for CTE center

A long-awaited Career and Technical Education Center (CTE), slated for construction next door to Louisa County High School, is one step closer to reality.

Jack Clark, director of operations with RRMM Architects, previewed plans for the 54,500-square foot facility at the school board’s March 3 meeting. Clark said the building, set to front Davis Highway (Route 22) near the northeastern end of Louisa County High School’s campus, will provide a state-of-the-art space for the division’s current CTE programs while offering ample room for new curriculum. (video)

Here’s a look at the school division’s plans for the center, which is expected to open in August 2027.

What’s in the building?

Louisa County Public Schools (LCPS) is already home to a thriving CTE program, so the new facility will provide space for both existing courses and new offerings.

With respect to existing programs, Clark said the building will feature an expansive area for the division’s culinary arts program, encompassing both kitchen and classroom space, as well as classroom and lab space for welding, nursing, firefighter and EMT training, residential construction and cosmetology.

The building will also house the division’s teacher training academy, which readies students for a career in education, and the accompanying Little Lions Learning Lab, a program that offers aspiring teachers a chance to work directly with young children and provides on-site childcare for division employees.

As for new programming, the building will provide space to train students to work on boats and other watercraft; to prepare students for careers in HVAC installation/repair and plumbing; and to ready students for work in the electrical and energy sector. Beyond that, the building will include lab space for computer-aided design and related tech fields.

The design team envisions the building as a space that not only prepares students for the careers of today, but also the jobs of tomorrow. With that in mind, the building will feature what Clark described as a “flex space” to accommodate “whatever comes down the pike.”

Beyond the flex space, Clark said, the building is designed to adapt to the changing needs of employers with built-in flexibility across its workspaces.

“We talked about that all throughout the design process, that we want to make these spaces as flexible as possible and a lot of that has to do with how the power is run in the building and where the panels are,” Clark said.

Superintendent of Schools Doug Straley and Mineral District representative Lloyd Runnett, who both serve on the committee that helped design the facility, echoed Clark.

Runnett said that creating an adaptable facility has been central to the design process while Straley said that staff has worked with industry partners to ensure the facility meets community needs.

“It’s an exciting project. [Our staff] and a lot of industry partners have been conversing over the last several months to put a product together that’s really going to best suit the needs of our students,” Straley said.

Beyond the classrooms and lab space, the center will feature a multi-purpose area, designed to accommodate everything from conferences to luncheons to banquets. Clark described the space as “the show piece” of the facility, noting that it will be situated near the building’s main public entrance off Davis Highway.

The multi-purpose space will cover more than 2,600 square feet inside the building and feature “operable” walls that adjust to accommodate a range of events. For examples, a wall through the center of the space can create two smaller rooms while walls along the main corridor can enclose the space for private meetings or open it up for public events.

“Because of the function and the layout and the way these operable walls work, there are many different opportunities for using this space. You could use it as one large space completely open to the corridor. Say you have a back-to-school night or a career expo that you are doing, it would be great to be able to walk into the building and see everything right there. Or you could do one large space with the walls to the corridor closed for a meeting or conference…or you could do some smaller spaces,” Clark said.

Clark also pointed to “opportunities outside,” highlighting doors leading to a patio, enclosed by a low wall, where people can gather during events. He added that the multi-purpose space will be located right across the corridor from the culinary program, allowing easy access for luncheons and banquets.

The building will also include several outdoor service areas that work in concert with the indoor classrooms and two parking lots.

With respect to the structure’s façade, Clark said the architects worked to create a campus feel, drawing on the same design features included at the high school. Like the school, the building will be brick and feature large glass windows at entrances.

“We wanted to tie into the look of Louisa County High School. We wanted to use the same forms. We wanted to use the same materials. We wanted to use the same vocabulary of design,” Clark said.

Center designed with security in mind

While the facility will feature cutting-edge classrooms and meeting space, it’s also designed with the safety of students in mind.

Clark said the division’s school safety task force proposed one significant feature, which wasn’t included at the outset—an elevated walkway connecting the building to the second floor of the high school. The walkway, which will be covered but not fully enclosed, will allow students to travel between the main school building and the center via a secure corridor.

Most of the building’s outdoor spaces will be enclosed by privacy fences. Its teacher training academy and Little Lions Learning Lab will occupy their own secure wing of the building with a separate entrance and parking lot, and enclosed playground.

Center could cost as much as $41 million

The board of supervisors allotted $31.6 million for the CTE center in the Fiscal Year 2025 capital budget. But the cost of the project could significantly exceed that estimate.

Clark said he expects the facility will cost between $34.6 and $41 million. Of that, between $23.8 million and $27.3 million would cover the cost of construction and site work; $2.2 million would pay for the building’s design; $2 to $3 million would cover furniture and equipment; and $1.2 to $1.8 million would be spent on technology.

Clark said the bridge connecting the center with the high school, which was tacked on during the design process, would likely add $2 to $3 million to the cost. He also noted that his projection includes a $2.4 to $2.7 million contingency to offset unanticipated costs encountered during construction.

The division will put the building out for bid as soon as this month with bid selection tentatively set for April or May. Clark said that he could only offer “a cost range” while contractors would present firm numbers for what it will take to make the building a reality.

Clark noted that he’s fielded interests from at least three contractors, including Nielsen Builders, the Harrisonburg-based firm that’s constructing a 500-seat addition to Louisa County Middle School, so bidding should be competitive.

But he expressed some concern that the project could skew toward the high end of his range. He said the construction industry is no longer experiencing lengthy lead times for materials, but costs are “still in fluctuation,” which could negatively impact the bottom line.

“We are not seeing the issue where you [can’t] get materials for a long time. The lead times have shrunk, but the prices of materials…have been continuing to creep up,” Clark said.

Beyond capital costs, the building will increase the division’s operating expenses, primarily because it requires more teachers. Straley said school officials haven’t decided whether to utilize all of the programming space when the facility first opens or implement a phased approach, allowing administrators to hire new staff over time.

“Certainly, we do have new programs, so we are going to need more staffing,” he said.

Facility expected to open for ’27-28 academic year

Assuming the division accepts a bid for the project by May, construction will start after school closes for the current academic year. Clark said it will take about two years to build the facility, noting the center should be ready to welcome students by the start of the 2027-28 school year.

“It’s not a big building. It’s less than 60,000 square feet. But it’s a complex building. There’s a lot going on here. It’s going to be a fantastic building,” he said.

The main entrance to Louisa County Public Schools’ Career and Technical Education Center. The facility is slated for construction next to Louisa County High School. (Image courtesy of RRMM Architects)

PJM recommends construction of transmission infrastructure through eastern Louisa

Amid an escalating demand for electricity driven, in part, by data center development, the entity that oversees the power grid in much of the eastern United States has recommended construction of a massive new transmission line that, if approved by state regulators, would slice through eastern Louisa County.

The board of managers at the regional transmission organization, PJM Interconnection, decided in late February to back several significant upgrades to the grid aimed at bringing electricity from the Midwest eastward and leveraging new power generation sources.

A significant slice of the power imported from the Midwest would come to Virginia, the global epicenter of the power-hungry data center industry, where electricity consumption could triple over the next 15 years.

Among the projects PJM backed is a new 765-kilovolt (kV) transmission line stretching 155 miles from Fauquier County in northern Virginia to Campbell County in the south-central part of the state and proposed for construction by Dominion Energy and its partners, American Electric Power Company (AEP) and FirstEnergy. In Campbell, the infrastructure would connect to an AEP transmission line running to the west.

The new line would cut through eastern Louisa County, likely following a similar route as a Dominion-owned 500 kV line that enters the county across Lake Anna. The line travels past the North Anna Nuclear Power Station and crosses the lake twice more. It continues south through Buckner and crosses into Hanover County east of Holly Grove.

The proposed 765 kV line would be capable of carrying three times the power of the 500 kV infrastructure. It would be slightly taller and could require a wider right-of-way, according to information detailing transmission infrastructure on AEP’s website.

In addition to that infrastructure, PJM approved a new 500 kV line that could cut across the lake and, potentially, the county’s northeastern edge. The Dominion-proposed line would connect North Anna to a new substation in Caroline County then travel north to Fauquier.

Among other upgrades, the organization also greenlit a 765 kV line from West Virginia to Maryland, travelling across part of Northern Virginia—another key component to strengthening the backbone of the grid to meet soaring demand.

“The proposals resolve critical west-east regional transfer reinforcement needs by introducing 765 kV transmission lines connecting the AEP system in the western portion of the PJM footprint with the rest of the network in the central and southern parts of PJM, primarily Virginia. The work also includes several regional projects that are driven by more local needs,” PJM said in a media release.

“A strong, efficient transmission system enables economic growth and ensures reliability for consumers across the PJM region,” said Aftab Khan, PJM’s executive vice president for operations, planning and security. “These projects are especially critical to reliably meet the increasing demand for electricity and leverage new generation resources.”

In a media release, Dominion echoed PJM, emphasizing the importance of upgrading the grid to integrate new generation sources and ensure reliability. The company singled out small modular reactors (SMR), an emerging nuclear generation technology that could be deployed at North Anna as soon as the early 2030s.

“Power demand in Virginia is growing at an unprecedented pace due to the growth of data centers and manufacturing, and the electrification of transportation and heating. At the same time, the region’s power generation mix is changing as the older generation is retired and more renewables and potentially SMRs are added to the grid,” the company said. “New ‘backbone’ transmission infrastructure is needed to reliably serve the growing needs of all our customers. These projects will support economic development and an ‘all of the above’ power generation mix, including renewables and potentially SMRs.”

Though the new transmission infrastructure got a greenlight from PJM, it still must win approval from the State Corporation Commission (SCC), which regulates Virginia’s utilities. County Administrator Christian Goodwin told the board of supervisors on Monday night that the SCC would consider the projects in 2026.

If the SCC okays the infrastructure, Goodwin said it would likely be constructed in the early 2030s. Project information on PJM’s website, however, lists the required in-service dates for both lines impacting Louisa as mid-2029.

With PJM approval in hand, Dominion said it would begin assessing potential routes and conducting environmental studies.

“[Dominion, AEP and FirstEnergy] are committed to collaborating with residents, local governments and other stakeholders in the project communities at every stage of the process. Community engagement is crucial for making informed decisions that reduce or prevent potential impacts,” the company said.

During a discussion about proposed upgrades to the grid at the board’s January 7 meeting, prior to PJM approval, Goodwin said the county would have “a seat at the table” when determining the route and footprint of any new transmission infrastructure constructed in the county. The county and members of the public would also have an opportunity to weigh in during the SCC’s approval process, he said.

Goodwin’s update at Monday’s meeting came just before a representative from Dominion Energy delivered the State of the Station report, an annual update on operations at North Anna. Goodwin acknowledged the presence of several Dominion officials, including external affairs representative Andre May, and suggested they might be able to answer board members’ questions. But supervisors didn’t ask any questions about the proposed lines, and Dominion officials didn’t discuss the projects during their presentation.

When the board discussed the proposed 765 kV line in January, Jackson District Supervisor Toni Williams, whose district would be impacted by the project, suggested that there could be enough land in the right-of-way along parts of the existing line to accommodate the upgrade. He noted that North Anna was initially supposed to have four reactors, instead of two, so some of the transmission corridors have room for double the infrastructure.

Mineral District Supervisor Duane Adams said that he understands the need to upgrade the grid given the growing demand for electricity but hopes the entities building the infrastructure will choose the “least disruptive route.”

Large-scale upgrades to the power grid have sparked heated battles in parts of Northern Virginia—the global epicenter of the data center industry—where residents have pushed back against high-voltage transmission lines proposed to snake through suburban neighborhoods, farmland and historic sites.

Consumer advocates have also raised concerns about pricey grid upgrades, arguing that data center operators, including tech giants like Meta, Google and AWS, should pay their fair share for the infrastructure. Otherwise, they say, the burden will fall on residential ratepayers.

PJM estimates the 765 kV line from Campbell to Fauquier and the 500 kV line from North Anna to Caroline would cost more than $613 million. The entire package of upgrades approved by PJM is late February is projected to cost more than $6.7 billion.

PJM recommended construction of new 765-kilovolt and 500-kilovolt transmission lines that could impact eastern Louisa County. (Map courtesy of Dominion Energy).

BOS roundup: Supes breeze through light agenda

The Louisa County Board of Supervisors on Monday night considered yet another light agenda, wrapping up public business in less than an hour and 15 minutes.

The board’s agenda didn’t include any action items and featured only one public hearing. But the latter was merely a formality—Dominion Energy’s annual State of the Station address in which executives from the company update the board on activity at the North Anna Nuclear Power Station.

Here’s a quick roundup of the meeting. (meeting materials, video)

Dominion delivers State of the Station report

Representatives from Dominion Energy attended Monday’s night meeting to deliver the company’s State of the Station report, an annual update on the goings-on at the North Anna Nuclear Power Station (NAPS).

The report and an accompanying public hearing are required under a 1984 settlement agreement between Dominion’s predecessor, the Virginia Electric and Power Company, and the county.

Lisa Hilbert, the site vice president at NAPS, briefed the board on everything from the plant’s safety record over the last year to its economic impact. Here are a few notable takeaways from her presentation.

In 2024, Dominion paid more than $11.16 million in taxes to Louisa County on behalf of the plant, about 7 percent of the county’s operating budget. Since the facility’s inception, the company has paid $435 million into county coffers.
The power station ranks as one of the county’s largest employers. It currently employs 803 people full-time and some 200 long-term contractors. About 1,000 additional workers visit the plant during periodic refueling outages.
North Anna’s twin 900-megawatt (MW) Westinghouse reactors, dubbed Units 1 and 2, operated with minimal interruption in 2024, running at 96.42 percent capacity. Unit 1 was shuttered for 36 days for refueling while Unit 2 experienced a two-day maintenance outage to repair a cable in the control rod system. In addition, both units were briefly ramped down to less than full power for other maintenance and repairs.
In August 2024, Dominion won approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a Subsequent License Renewal for both reactors. The renewal allows Units 1 and 2 to operate through 2058 and 2060 respectively, some 80 years since they began commercial power generation.
Beyond Units 1 and 2, Dominion holds a Combined Operating License for a yet-to-be constructed 1500 MW GE-Hitachi reactor. While the company has no concrete plans to build the third unit, Hilbert said that holding the license means the reactor could be built. If Dominion opted to move forward with construction of a third traditional reactor, it would require approval from state regulators.
Dominion is actively exploring the possibility of developing a small modular reactor (SMR) at North Anna. As the name suggests, SMRs are smaller, simpler versions of traditional reactors, which harness nuclear fission to produce energy. SMRs typically produce up to 300 MW of power, about a third of the generation capacity of NAPS’s current reactors. Sarah Marshall, Dominion’s manager of state and local affairs for infrastructure strategy, said the company plans to have its first SMR online by the early 2030s. To date, small modular reactors haven’t been deployed for commercial power generation in the western hemisphere.

No community members spoke during the public hearing.

Read Dominion’s State of the Station report here.

Supes adopt protocol for upgrades to private roads, ask planning commission to review VDOT’s role in plat approval

Supervisors tackled a pair of items related to private roads and entrances to subdivisions.

In the first, the board sent to the planning commission for consideration a proposal from Mountain Road District Supervisor Tommy Barlow, which would remove a county rule requiring the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to review plats as a means of approving proposed entrances to subdivided lots.

Barlow, a surveyor by trade, said that he’d been informed by VDOT Residency Administrator Scott Thornton that the agency no longer signs off on plats. He also noted that VDOT no longer conducts site visits to determine the best place for entrances but still offers recommendations without the benefit of an on-the-ground review.

Barlow said that requiring VDOT to review plats for subdivision entrances leads to unnecessary delays. He said that agency approval could be addressed when property owners apply for an entrance permit later in the process.

“If they are not going to sign plats, and they’re not going to come out to the field to review [entrances] then why are we sending [this] to them for part of the review process? It’s 45 days that it holds things up. It would be different if they were going out and making an informed decision about where the driveways were and had a legitimate reason for moving them,” Barlow said.

The board voted unanimously to send Barlow’s recommendation to the planning commission for consideration. Any changes to the county code connected to Barlow’s proposal would require public hearings in front of the commission and the board of supervisors and an affirmative vote by the latter body.

In a separate item, the board adopted a policy establishing a protocol for potential upgrades to private roads. (protocol)

County Administrator Christian Goodwin said the document provides a framework for staff to follow when citizens approach the county about making improvements to roads that aren’t part of the state system.

“We have some older subdivisions in the county that have private roads or not fully finished roads, according to the totality of the subdivision’s plans. In some cases, we have some road bonds for those roads. In some cases, we have people that might be living in those subdivisions who believe that their road should be constructed to state specification and that the county has some responsibility to do that even though it’s private property. This would just kind of provide a clear process to deal with any of those situations,” Goodwin said.

Under the protocol, staff would determine if a developer has posted a road bond and if funding from the bond is still available. If sufficient funding is available, the county would work with stakeholders to upgrade the road and bring it into the state system. If some funding is available, but it’s deemed insufficient to improve the road to state specifications, the bond funding would be provided to a homeowners’ or property owners’ association, assuming one exists, for use as it sees fit. The county would expend the available funds for road improvements in situations where no HOA or POA is in place. If no bond funding is available, residents would be informed that “public funds are not currently available to improve private roads.”

Prior to adoption of the protocol, the county didn’t have a policy for navigating requests for improvements to private roads. Goodwin said that the county operated under the assumption that “there is a developer that is going to continue the entirety of the work in a subdivision in some protracted amount of time.”

In addition to the protocol, Goodwin said that staff plans to propose a change to county code requiring that bonds be updated periodically to help ensure there’s sufficient funding available to complete the work promised at the outset of a subdivision’s development should a developer fail to do so.

Cuckoo District Supervisor Chris McCotter said that adopting the protocol is a step in the right direction, noting the large number of inquiries he gets from citizens related to improving private roads.

“This is the number one or two thing that I get from constituents. One is, ‘Why is my assessment where it is?’ And two is, ‘Can we get my road paved by the county?’ As we know, the county doesn’t pave roads. That’s VDOT and the homeowners, developers or HOAs’ responsibility. So this is great. This will give me the opportunity to communicate to constituents a policy,” McCotter said.

Board oks committee expectations

Supervisors approved a policy that sets guidelines and expectations for citizen appointees who serve on 11 county boards, committees and commissions. The document, which will be provided to both current and prospective appointees, describes the purpose of each panel and lays out broad rules of conduct for members. (guidelines)

The policy covers only boards, committees and commissions that are specifically prescribed tasks in state code including the Louisa County Planning Commission; Board of Zoning Appeals; Board of Equalization; Board of Building Appeals; Electoral Board; Tourism Advisory Committee; Industrial Development Authority; Local Emergency Planning Committee; Community Policy Management Team; Family Assessment and Planning Team; and the Agriculture/Forestal and Rural Preservation Committee.

PC preview: Commission to hold work session, skip regular monthly meeting

The Louisa County Planning Commission will hold a long-range planning work session on Thursday evening at 5 pm but will forego its regular monthly meeting.

The commission typically convenes at 7 pm to hold public hearings and consider unfinished business from the previous month, but with no items requiring a public hearing on the docket and no unfinished business, the commission will focus all its attention on the work session.

Here’s what’s on planners’ agenda.

Commission to discuss ‘Retail sales of controlled substances’

The commission will continue a discussion started last month about crafting an ordinance aimed at regulating businesses that sell controlled substances—items that are regulated by the federal government based on their medical use, potential for abuse, and safety or dependence liability.

Deputy County Administrator Chris Coon told the commission during a work session in February that, at the request of members of the board of supervisors, staff began looking into ways to regulate where stores that sell controlled substances can set up shop in the county, if at all.

Coon said the conversation was prompted by ongoing discussions among lawmakers in Richmond related to establishing a retail market for cannabis. While it’s legal to possess small amounts of cannabis in Virginia and grow four plants for personal use, the state has yet to legalize retail sales beyond licensed medical dispensaries.

During this year’s General Assembly session, the Democratic-controlled legislature passed a bill that would establish a regulated retail cannabis market, but Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin has signaled he’ll veto the legislation.

Still, Coon emphasized to commissioners the value of putting an ordinance in place ahead of potential changes in state law and presented a proposed definition for how the county could define “retail sales of controlled substances” and options for regulating the use.

Coon suggested defining the use as the “sale of legally authorized controlled substances directly to consumers, including but not limited to prescription medications, nicotine vapor products, hemp products intended for smoking, and other regulated substances. This category includes pharmacies, medical dispensaries, and other authorized retail establishments but excludes manufacturing, distribution, or wholesale facilities.”

Coon suggested that the “retail sales of controlled substances” could be regulated in several ways including limiting businesses that sell controlled substances to certain zoning designations and requiring that proprietors obtain a conditional use permit while prohibiting the use within 1,000 feet of schools or day cares; requiring that proprietors of establishments that sell controlled substances obtain a conditional use permit and imposing stringent rules like requiring a DEA license; or prohibiting certain businesses that sell controlled substances from setting up shop in the county at all.

Commissioners expressed some concerns with Coon’s definition and proposals, but a couple made clear that they’d prefer not to allow cannabis sales in the county should lawmakers in Richmond set up a legal marketplace. Staff agreed to return to the commission with some reworked options, but the meeting materials don’t include any new information about the item.

Commission to discuss focus area plans

In 2019, Louisa County adopted its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, a long-range planning document that provides a roadmap for the county’s future development. While county officials finished the bulk of the document, they left some sections incomplete including appendices covering transportation, public facilities, utilities, and focus areas.

Over the last few years, staff has been working with the planning commission and board of supervisors to put the finishing touches on the plan as it prepares for a state-mandated five-year review.

At Thursday’s work session, the commission will dig into a review of the draft “focus areas” section, which zeroes in on the county’s eight designated growth areas: Zion Crossroads, Ferncliff, Shannon Hill and Gum Spring along Interstate 64; Louisa and Mineral in the center of the county; Gordonsville at its northwestern edge; and Lake Anna along its northern border.

Focus area plans are intended to quickly articulate both the characteristics of specific areas and a vision for their future. They’re also designed to provide guidance to citizens and developers for the type and quality of development expected in each area, according to a memo to the commission from Community Development Department staff.

Read the draft plans here.

PC to discuss proposed tweaks to Land Development Regulations

Over the last few months, the board of supervisors have enacted a series of changes to the county’s Land Development Regulations aimed at cleaning up discrepancies, ensuring compliance with state and federal law and implementing updates that align with the future vision for the community as articulated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.

During Thursday’s work session, the commission will begin reviewing another set of potential tweaks proposed by Community Development Department staff. The changes touch on everything from how the county defines certain uses to plat approvals and setback requirements.

Engage Louisa