This week in county government; BOS to consider grants for AWS; Straley previews proposed $53.7 million capital budget for LCPS; McGuire to challenge Good for R nom in VA05; Burn ban in effect
This week in county government; BOS to consider grants for AWS; Straley previews proposed $53.7 million capital budget for LCPS; McGuire to challenge Good for R nom in VA05; Burn ban in effect
Engage Louisa is a nonpartisan newsletter that keeps folks informed about Louisa County government. We believe our community is stronger and our government serves us better when we increase transparency, accessibility, and engagement.
This week in county government: public meetings, Nov. 20 through Nov. 25
For the latest information on county meetings including public meetings of boards, commissions, authorities, work groups, and internal county committees, click here. (Note: Louisa County occasionally schedules internal committee/work group meetings after publication time. Check the county’s website for the most updated information).
Monday, November 20
Louisa County Board of Supervisors, Legislative Work Session, Public Meeting Room, Louisa County Office Building, 1 Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 3:30 pm. (agenda, livestream) Supervisors will meet with the county’s newly elected state legislative delegation to discuss their legislative priorities ahead of the 2024 General Assembly session.
Louisa County Board of Supervisors, Public Meeting Room, Louisa County Office Building, I Woolfolk Ave., Louisa, 6 pm. (agenda packet, livestream) The board will convene in closed session at 5 pm.
Other meetings
Tuesday, November 21
Louisa Town Council, 212 Fredericksburg Ave., Louisa, 6 pm. (agenda)
Additional information about Louisa County’s upcoming public meetings is available here.
Interested in taking your talents to one of the county’s numerous boards and commissions? Find out more here including which boards have vacancies and how to apply.
At busy meeting, BOS to consider infrastructure and performance grants for AWS
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors will hold a pair of meetings on Monday. At 3:30 pm, supervisors will meet with the county’s newly elected delegation in the state legislature to discuss their legislative priorities ahead of the 2024 General Assembly session.
At 6 pm, the board will convene for the public portion of its bimonthly meeting with a wide-ranging agenda on tap. Most notably, supervisors will consider approving an update to a performance agreement with Amazon Web Services. The proposed update includes incentives for the tech giant as it develops two data center campuses in the county.
Supervisors to consider infrastructure and performance grants for AWS: Supervisors will consider approving an amended performance agreement with Amazon Web Services. The updated agreement outlines infrastructure and performance grants that the county is expected to provide the company during and after its development of a pair of data center campuses.
In late August, the county announced that AWS plans to build two data center campuses in its newly created Technology Overlay District, a special zoning designation approved by the Board of Supervisors in April that’s designed to attract lucrative tech sector development. The project is part of the tech giant’s plan to invest at least $35 billion to build data center campuses across the state by 2040, an initiative that Governor Glenn Youngkin announced in January.
One of the campuses—dubbed the Lake Anna Technology Campus (LATC)—is slated for 146 acres at the corner of Kentucky Springs Road and Haley Drive adjacent to the North Anna Nuclear Power Station. The other—the North Creek Technology Campus—is planned for 1,444 acres south of Route 33 and east of Mount Airy Road across from the Northeast Creek Reservoir.
Supervisors approved an initial version of the performance agreement at their September 5 meeting, which broadly lays out what both parties are expected to bring to the table. The county intends to offer AWS both tax breaks, in the form of a reduced business personal property tax rate, and infrastructure and performance grants. AWS plans to make at least an $11 billion capital investment in the county by July 1, 2040 including paying for all off-site infrastructure to support the campuses.
The initial agreement left out key details about the carrots the county is using to lure the company. But some were filled in in late September when the board adopted a reduced business personal property tax rate for data center equipment and an accelerated depreciation schedule. The board is set to fill in more details Monday night, specifically related to the grant funding.
Per the performance agreement, the county is obligated to provide Amazon with both infrastructure grants for 20 years (beginning in 2026) and performance grants for another five, provided the company reaches certain capital investment benchmarks.
The agreement runs through 2050 to align with a state incentives package. The General Assembly last session approved a $140 million “Cloud Computing Cluster Infrastructure Grant Fund,” which will provide state grants to AWS to entice the company to build data center campuses in rural areas that don’t currently have the infrastructure to support them. The state grant program requires that localities where AWS invests provide two dollars for every one dollar in state grant funding.
“The purpose of (the) incentives is to reimburse Amazon for some of those infrastructure costs. The same with the state grants so those two items align. The second is to continue to incentivize them to invest in the county over and above that $11 billion commitment,” Economic Development Director Andy Wade told the board in September, adding that “all indications are that the $11 billion will be eclipsed.”
According to the amended agreement up for consideration on Monday, the county would return to AWS, in the form of annual infrastructure grants, 15 percent of the incremental tax revenue it receives on capital investment between $150 million and $11 billion. For capital investment between $11 billion and $20 billion, AWS would receive 20 percent of the incremental tax revenue. That figure rises to 25 percent for capital investment between $20 and $30 billion and 30 percent if capital investment reaches $30 billion and beyond. The county would be on the hook for the grant funding from 2026 through 2046.
With respect to the proposed performance grants, which would run from 2047 to 2051, the county would return to AWS 17 percent of incremental tax revenue annually on capital investment between $11 billion and $20 billion and 20 percent on anything beyond that.
Incremental tax revenue refers to the incremental increase in real estate and business personal property taxes generated by the company’s activities and activities performed on its behalf when compared to the tax revenue generated by each of the sites as of January 1, 2023, according to the agreement.
Just after the county announced its deal with AWS, Wade said that the company planned to build 11 data centers between the two campuses that could generate $25 million in tax revenue annually at full buildout and create 275 jobs. But discussions at county meetings and publicly available documents suggest that the company’s construction plans could be far more extensive.
AWS Senior Planning and Development Manager Casey Frazier told the Planning Commission at its November 9 meeting that while his company is still developing its plans for the NCTC, the more expansive of the two campuses, the site could potentially include between 20 and 25 facilities. Frazier characterized that as a conservative estimate and said there’s still a “fair amount of flexibility” in what the final number would be.
Another indicator of the potentially massive scope of the NCTC is the extensive electrical infrastructure that Rappahannock Electric Cooperative intends to bring to the site to feed the data centers’ intense demand for power. The campus is expected to include 10 substations, covering 10 acres each, according to a Buffer and Landscaping Plan shared at the Planning Commission meeting. Lee Brock, REC’s principal engineering manager for energy projects, said each substation would have the capacity to provide 300 megawatts (MW) of power, meaning the company could supply as much as 3 gigawatts (GW) of power to the site. One GW is roughly enough electricity to power 750,000 homes.
As for the smaller LATC, an application AWS submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers to obtain permission in impact jurisdictional wetlands and Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) includes a conceptual plan that shows seven standard data centers on the site and two smaller “specialty data centers.”
According to the plan, the facilities would cover some 1.7 million square feet and provide a minimum of 420 MW of data center capacity. The campus is expected to include two substations capable of providing 300 MW of power each, one owned by REC and the other by Dominion Virginia Power.
Beyond the utilities’ infrastructure, AWS plans to construct extensive public infrastructure to support the campuses including water and sewer lines and pump stations, and new roads.
Because data centers typically require large quantities of water to cool the servers inside, accessing the resource is a key piece of the infrastructure puzzle. Both campuses will rely on the county’s 187-acre Northeast Creek Reservoir for most of their water supply, according to county and company officials.
The NCTC, located just across the street, will draw both potable and raw water from the reservoir and will be served by public sewer. The Lake Anna campus will draw only raw water. Wade has said that the campuses could draw some 630,000 gallons of water per day from the reservoir, which has a safe yield capacity of 3.2 million gpd based on a recent analysis.
Amazon will pay for the water and sewer infrastructure including a miles-long raw water line to the Lake Anna campus with a portion of the cost offset by the county and state grants. The county will design, build, own and operate it and charge AWS for its water use, according to county officials. The county and the Louisa County Water Authority (LCWA) are negotiating a Water Services Agreement with AWS that sets rates and connection fees, among other project parameters. The agreement will be considered by LCWA’s board and the Board of Supervisors at future meetings.
AWS also plans to build a public road system within the NCTC, according to the Buffer and Landscaping Plan. The system will provide access to both the data centers and 375 acres of park land that AWS plans to donate to the county on the eastern and southern end of the campus. One proposed road extends south from Route 33 and snakes through the campus, connecting to Mount Airy Road at the southern end of the site. AWS also plans to build an extension off White Walnut Road at the campus’s southern end, connecting it with the other proposed road just east of its intersection with Mount Airy.
Wade has said that AWS would begin developing the LATC first with construction potentially beginning as soon as next year and the first data center online by 2025. He said in an email to Engage Louisa earlier this month that the company intends to rely on ground water for the first phase of the project, which is expected to include one to two data centers, while it awaits completion of a raw water line.
Supervisors to approve legislative platform for 2024: Ahead of the 2024 General Assembly session, supervisors will approve the county’s legislative priorities, a set of policy goals and initiatives that the board hopes the county’s representatives in Richmond will advocate for when the legislature convenes in early January.
Prior to approving the platform at their regular meeting, supervisors will hold a pre-meeting work session to discuss their legislative wish list with the county’s newly elected delegation: 10th District Senator-Elect John McGuire (R-Goochland), 11th District Senator-Elect Creigh Deeds (D-Charlottesville), 55th District Delegate-Elect Amy Laufer (D-Albemarle) and 59th District Delegate-Elect Buddy Fowler (R-Hanover). McGuire and Fowler represent most of Louisa County while Deeds and Laufer represent four precincts on its western end.
All four legislators won their seats in the November 7 election when all 140 seats in the General Assembly were up for grabs in new districts redrawn during the once-a-decade redistricting process. McGuire has represented Louisa County in the House of Delegates since 2018 and will move to the legislature’s upper chamber. Fowler has represented part of Hanover County in the House since 2014. Deeds has represented the Charlottesville area in the Senate since 2001. He’s expected to wield significant power in the chamber as chair of the Commerce and Labor Committee and a high-ranking member of the Finance and Appropriations Committee. Laufer is a newcomer to the legislature, winning her first term in the House.
At publication time, the board’s proposed legislative platform wasn’t publicly available. County Administrator Christian Goodwin said last week that the platform was being finalized and would be shared at the work session. Check out the board’s 2023 legislative priorities here.
Board to consider TJPDC legislative platform for 2024: After voting to adopt their own legislative platform for 2024, supervisors will consider greenlighting a set of regional priorities presented by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. The planning district includes Louisa, Greene, Nelson, Fluvanna, Albemarle and Charlottesville and all six localities’ governing bodies must sign off on the wish list.
The proposed platform includes three top priorities related to public education, budgets and funding, and land use and growth management.
With respect to public education, the commission’s localities “urge the State to fully fund its share of the realistic costs of the Standards of Quality (SOQ) and reverse policy changes that previously reduced funding or shifted funding responsibility to localities.” The draft platform notes that, according to a study by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, the state underfunds public education with local school divisions receiving less funding per pupil than divisions in other states.
“Local governments consistently go ‘above and beyond’ by appropriating twice as much K-12 funding as required by the state. We believe localities need an adequately-defined SOQ so that state funding better aligns with prevailing local practice in schools that drives the additional local dollars,” the platform states. “This could include recognizing additional instructional positions and increasing state-funded staffing ratios for various non-instructional positions in the education funding formula.”
On budgets and funding, the draft platform states that the TJPDC’s member localities “urge the governor and legislature to enhance state aid to localities, to not impose unfunded mandates on or shift costs to localities, and to enhance local revenue options.”
Specifically, the platform advocates for “making additional revenue options available to localities in order to diversify the local revenue stream” and expresses opposition to any new funding requirements passed on to localities by the state as well as efforts to redirect local dollars to state coffers. With respect to the latter, the platform urges the legislature not to confiscate the local portion of the recordation tax or implement any state-mandated exemption to the local sales tax unless a viable revenue replacement is established.
With respect to land use and growth management, the draft platform states that the member localities “encourage the State to resist preempting or circumventing existing land use authorities, and to support local authority to plan and regulate land use.”
According to the draft platform, the TJPDC members support the state “providing additional tools to plan and manage growth, as current land use authority often is inadequate to allow local governments to provide for balanced growth in ways that protect and improve quality of life.” The members also encourage the legislature to allow localities’ broader authority to levy impact fees to support local infrastructure impacted by growth and to make changes to the current proffer law, which limits “the scope of impacts that may be addressed by proffers.”
The localities oppose legislation that would restrict local oversight of the placement of telecommunications infrastructure, singles out specific land uses for special treatment without regard for the impact of such uses in particular locations and exempts additional facilities serving as event spaces from building, fire code and other health and safety regulations.
Board to consider passing resolution in support of E. Green Springs Road bridge replacement: Supervisors will consider approving a resolution in support of the Virginia Department of Transportation’s plan to replace a bridge across Wheeler Creek on E. Green Springs Road (Route 617).
The proposed resolution also states that the county concurs with the department’s plan to replace the bridge with “a structure width that is less than that designated by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets manual.” The board’s concurrence is required for the project to move forward.
According to the meeting materials, VDOT intends to replace the bridge, which has a 12-ton weight limit, with a new steel beam, timber deck superstructure. Work is expected to begin in the spring of 2025, closing the road for about four weeks. VDOT plans to use money earmarked for state maintenance to fund the project.
Supervisors to consider supplemental appropriation for FEMS Department: Supervisors will consider appropriating $70,000 to the county’s Fire and EMS Department to cover the rising cost of compressed gases.
The proposed resolution notes that the cost of compressed gases continues to climb and, with the recent opening of the New Bridge Fire and EMS station, “the department's needs in this area continue to grow.”
If approved, the county plans to draw the additional funding from money reserved for contingencies.
Supervisors to hear three presentations: Supervisors will hear three presentations Monday night. In the first, Firefly Fiber Broadband will brief the board on its effort to bring universal high-speed internet access to the county by 2025. Firefly last provided an update on the project at supervisors’ September 18 meeting.
The board earmarked $9 million in local funding for the project in 2021, appropriating its second roughly $3 million installment as part of the FY24 capital budget. Firefly also received a $79 million state grant for its Regional Internet Service Expansion Project (RISE), an initiative aimed at delivering broadband access to all or part of 13 Central Virginia localities including Louisa.
In the second presentation, supervisors will get an update from the Louisa Arts Center. The center received $60,000 in county funds during the FY24 budget process.
In the third presentation, the board will hear from One Church, One Child, a statewide adoption education and recruitment program. According to its website, the organization’s primary focus is “finding families to adopt the hundreds of African American children who are waiting for a family.” Founded in 1985, the group works with churches to educate and identify adoptive families and is, in part, funded by the Virginia Department of Social Services.
Straley previews proposed $53.7 million capital budget for LCPS
Note to readers: The article below was written by University of Richmond sophomore Sassan Fahim as part of coursework for Professor Tom Mullen’s Community Journalism at Home and Abroad class. Engage Louisa is grateful for Sassan’s contribution.
By Sassan Fahim
The Louisa County School Board, at its November 6 meeting, received details on the division’s proposed capital spending requests for Fiscal Year 2025 and beyond. (video)
Superintendent Doug Straley and department heads briefed the board on the draft Capital Improvement Plan, a 20-year road map for spending on substantial and long-lasting items such as new school buildings, buses and technology upgrades. The administrators mainly focused on spending requests for the coming fiscal year.
The board will vote on adopting the plan at its December meeting before forwarding it to the Board of Supervisors for consideration during the FY25 budget process. Supervisors have the final say on when and if items receive funding.
The division is asking for $53.7 million for FY25 including $855,000 for school buses and bus equipment. Specifically, the division is requesting funding for five regular buses and one bus that meets accessibility and disability needs. Other large projects include $140,000 for the replacement of cafeteria equipment, $75,000 for resurfacing the LCHS track, $30,000 for upgrades to the fuel tank monitoring system at the bus garage, $25,000 for security camera upgrades, and $255,000 for technology upgrades.
The largest costs for 2025 are a proposed addition to Louisa County Middle School ($26 million) and the new Career and Technical Education Center ($25 million).
The middle school addition, expected to accommodate about 500 students, would also house the division’s alternative education center. According to Straley, the addition is expected to include “11 classrooms in the alternative ed center, as well as 20 regular classrooms, five science labs, four SPED rooms, as well as two resource classrooms for the middle school.”
Site plans for the LCMS addition have been completed and submitted for the first round of county approval, according to Technology Director David Childress. The plan is expected to get final approval by early March before being put out to bid. Construction could begin as soon as next May, assuming supervisors approve the funding. This fiscal year, the board approved more than $2 million to design both the middle school addition and the CTE center.
During the meeting, the board also approved about $107,000 in additional design funding for other improvements at LCMS including renovating science classrooms, expanding the auxiliary gym, and replacing the school’s chiller.
The proposed CTE center is also in the design phase. Childress said the division is looking to maximize space and potentially include a second floor in the facility. He and Straley didn’t provide any information about how much that would cost.
“We’re working with the high school…to see if there are additional programs that we could pull out of the high school that we could put into this building. So, as we are looking to try to increase the capacity of the high school in the future, we would be able to accommodate that,” Childress said.
Beyond FY25, the draft spending plan projects about $19.5 million in spending on new school buses and related equipment over the next 20 years, $19.6 million in upgrades to HVAC systems over the same time frame and almost $9 million in technology upgrades. Between FY30 and FY34, the division anticipates spending $36 million on elementary schools.
Prior to reviewing the draft CIP, the board unanimously approved about $250,000 in spending to build dugouts at the softball field. The board okayed $750,000 in upgrades to the softball and baseball complex as part of a previous capital budget. The cost of the softball dugouts was defended by Board Chair Greg Strickland, who said that “it is a whole lot of money” but it is “what the market is, unfortunately.”
About the author: Sassan Fahim is a sophomore at the University of Richmond who is passionate about political science and psychology. Sassan loves watching sports, especially football, and plays club frisbee and baseball at UR.
McGuire to challenge Good for Republican nomination in 5th Congressional District
Just a week after winning the 10th District seat in the Virginia Senate, Delegate John McGuire announced he’s running for another office.
In an email to supporters last Wednesday, McGuire said he’s challenging Rep. Bob Good for the Republican nomination in the 5th Congressional District, describing himself as a staunch supporter of former President Donald Trump and a unifier who gets things done. He painted Good as a chaos agent who turned his back on Trump and accused the congressman of being “more focused on getting on the news and serving himself than on serving the people.”
McGuire pointed to Good’s endorsement of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for the presidency in 2024 as evidence that he betrayed Trump and criticized Good for joining with seven other Republicans to oust former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, suggesting that the move threw the party into turmoil and helped Democrats prevail in Virginia’s state legislative elections earlier this month.
McGuire pledged to do his part to unify the party behind Trump ahead of the 2024 presidential election and “focus on beating the Democrats and their Marxist, freedom-crushing policies.”
“We can do better than Good,” he said.
A fitness instructor and former Navy SEAL from Goochland County, McGuire has represented Louisa and the 56th District in the House of Delegates since 2018. He’s made two previous bids for Congress. In 2020, he vied for the Republican nomination in the 7th District, narrowly losing to Del. Nick Freitas in a party-run convention. McGuire launched a second bid in the 7th last year before redistricting derailed those plans by moving the district to the outskirts of northern Virginia. He then shifted gears and ran for state Senate, easily beating a Democrat write-in candidate in the November 7 election.
The McGuire-Good matchup pits two hard-right politicians against one another in a solidly conservative district. Both men have questioned the results of the 2020 presidential election with McGuire attending the “Stop the Steal” rally-turned-riot outside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 and Good voting against certifying the election results. Good is a member of the House Freedom Caucus, an ultra-conservative group of lawmakers who frequently oppose bipartisan deals on government spending.
As it may be challenging to run to Good’s right, McGuire has tried to position himself as a Trump true believer who’s committed to fighting for, as he puts it, “We the People” while casting Good as a self-serving turncoat who deserted the former president at a critical moment.
“On the day our president was wrongly indicted, Bob abandoned Trump by endorsing another candidate,” McGuire said in Wednesday’s email.
When he endorsed DeSantis this spring, Good said in a statement that he thought the Florida governor gave Republicans the best chance to win back the White House.
McGuire’s challenge to Good comes as little surprise to political insiders. Politico reported earlier this month that McGuire was expected to launch a bid for the seat, citing two anonymous sources. The article said that while there’s no sign McGuire’s coordinating with McCarthy, the former House speaker, or Trump, his candidacy “nonetheless aligns with the interests of Trump and McCarthy allies who hope to exact revenge against Good, a Freedom Caucus hardliner who's made his fair share of enemies in the House GOP.”
While McGuire’s announcement may have pleased Good’s adversaries inside the beltway, it sparked the ire of some Republicans closer to home. Two of the three candidates who ran against McGuire for the Republican nomination in the 10th—Louisa County Board of Supervisors Chair Duane Adams and Powhatan resident Sandy Brindley—issued a statement Wednesday afternoon calling on McGuire to drop out of the race and fulfill his commitment to serve his full term in the Senate.
“Instead of continuing to climb the political ladder for his own personal ambition, and primarying America's most conservative Congressman, Mr. McGuire should drop out of the race, apologize to his constituents, and be the leader we need in Richmond,” Adams and Brindley said.
In a Facebook post, Adams, a close ally of Good who won his endorsement during the fight for the 10th District nomination, said that McGuire hadn’t been straight with voters.
“On the campaign trail, John McGuire said he wasn’t going to run against Congressman Good and that he would be the leader we needed in the State Senate. He lied to the voters,” Adams said.
The Goochland County Republican Committee joined Adams and Brindley in rebuking the senator-elect, passing a resolution of no confidence in McGuire and sharply criticizing him for joining the 5th District race just after winning election to the Senate.
In its resolution, the committee said that 10th District voters had been “misled and betrayed” and that it was now apparent that McGuire’s “intentions were primarily self-serving rather than driven by a genuine desire for public service.”
At publication time, McGuire hadn’t publicly responded to either GCRC’s resolution or Adams’ and Brindley’s statement. In a press release Friday afternoon, McGuire’s campaign claimed it raised $250,000 during his first 48 hours in the race.
Good hasn’t commented on the primary challenge on social media and his campaign hasn’t issued a statement.
A former member of the Campbell County Board of Supervisors, Good ousted one-term incumbent Denver Riggleman in the 5th District Republican convention in 2020, riding a wave of discontent among conservative activists angry that Riggleman officiated a same-sex wedding. He went on to beat Democrat Cameron Webb by about five points in the general election to win his first term in Congress. The 2021 redistricting process made the 5th slightly more Republican-friendly and Good bested Democrat Josh Throneburg by 16 points in last year’s midterm election. The district stretches from Louisa, western Hanover and Albemarle south to the Virginia-North Carolina line.
Republicans in the 5th have been partial to party-run conventions to choose their nominee. But a new state law requiring the wide availability of absentee voting in nominating contests makes it difficult, if not impossible, for parties to employ a nominating method other than a state-run primary. Unless the party can find a work-around, Good and McGuire will face off in a primary on June 18.
County-wide burn ban in effect
As wildfires rage in parts of Virginia and dry conditions persist, Louisa County has banned open air burning until further notice.
In a press release Thursday, the county announced the burn ban, citing “worsening dry conditions along with a weather pattern that is expected to bring an increase in wind.”
Under the ban, people are barred from: burning brush, leaves, grass, trash, debris or any other flammable material; the ignition or maintenance of any open fire; agricultural burning (agricultural wastes, crops, field burning, etc.); and residential, commercial or industrial burning. The prohibition doesn’t apply to charcoal, gas or liquid-fired grills.
Anyone who violates the ban is subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor and a maximum $500 fine per violation. In addition, violators will be held liable for “all costs incurred in controlling or attempting to control any fire resulting from prohibited burning,” according to the release.
The county enacted the burn ban under a section of county code that authorizes the county administrator, after consulting with the Fire and EMS chief and other relevant agencies, to prohibit open air burning in all or part of the county when conditions exist “to create an extraordinary fire hazard.”
The county offers the following tips for fire prevention during dry conditions.
Do not toss cigarettes or cigars on the ground or from a vehicle. It is dangerous and illegal.
Adjust your trailer chains so they do not drag the pavement, creating sparks while driving.
Do not burn anything in barrels during this time.
Check lawnmowers and farm equipment for properly working spark arresters.
Be cautious using lawnmowers to mulch leaves as hot bearings and exhaust can easily start a fire.
Move anything that will burn far away from structures, items like firewood, dry and dead landscaping plants, compost piles, brush piles, etc.
Notify your electric company when dead trees or overhanging limbs endanger electric wires.
For more information, call the Louisa County Fire and EMS Office at (540) 967-3491.
Click here for contact information for the Louisa County Board of Supervisors.
Find agendas and minutes from previous Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission meetings as well as archived recordings here.
Click here for contact information for the Louisa County School Board.
Click here for minutes and agendas for School Board meetings. Click here for archived video.
Click here to access past editions of Engage Louisa.